{"id":6542,"date":"2006-11-22T21:09:32","date_gmt":"2006-11-22T21:09:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/127.0.0.1\/import\/?p=542"},"modified":"2006-11-22T21:09:32","modified_gmt":"2006-11-22T21:09:32","slug":"l-article-notable-du-jour","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/l-article-notable-du-jour\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;article notable du jour"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dans le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/e28495ce-7988-11db-b257-0000779e2340.html\" hreflang=\"fr\">Financial Times<\/a> (ma traduction)&nbsp;:<\/p>\n<p><em>Les pauvres chinois se sont appauvris \u00e0 une p\u00e9riode ou le pays connaissait une croissance substancielle, d&rsquo;apr\u00e8s un \u00e9conomiste de la Banque Mondiale. Le revenu r\u00e9el des 10% les plus pauvres des 1.3 milliards de chinois a baiss\u00e9 de 2.4% entre 2001 et 2003, d&rsquo;apr\u00e8s l&rsquo;analyse, une p\u00e9riode durant laquelle l&rsquo;\u00e9conomie a cr\u00fb a pr\u00e8s de 10% par an. Au m\u00eame moment, le revenu des 10% de chinois les plus riches a augment\u00e9 de plus de 16%. (&#8230;) L&rsquo;analyse sugg\u00e8re qu&rsquo;un nombre consid\u00e9rable de personnes sous le seuil de pauvret\u00e9 ont \u00e9t\u00e9 victimes d&rsquo;un choc de revenu &#8211; ils n&rsquo;ont pu maintenir leur consommation qu&rsquo;en d\u00e9pensant leur \u00e9pargne.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>L&rsquo;article se poursuit en constatant que cette tendance est probablement sous-\u00e9valu\u00e9e&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>EDIT&nbsp;: <a href=\"http:\/\/geographie.blog.lemonde.fr\/2006\/11\/23\/lviii\/\" hreflang=\"fr\">G\u00e9ographe du Monde<\/a> illustre le sujet.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\"><p>Dans le Financial Times (ma traduction)&nbsp;: Les pauvres chinois se sont appauvris \u00e0 une p\u00e9riode ou le pays connaissait une croissance substancielle, d&rsquo;apr\u00e8s un \u00e9conomiste de la Banque Mondiale. Le revenu r\u00e9el des 10% les plus pauvres des 1.3 milliards de chinois a baiss\u00e9 de 2.4% entre 2001 et 2003, <a class=\"mh-excerpt-more\" href=\"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/l-article-notable-du-jour\/\" title=\"L&rsquo;article notable du jour\">(Lire la suite&#8230;)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":59424,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ecoblabla"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6542"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6542\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/59424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econoclaste.eu\/econoclaste\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}